🔗 Share this article

Only two days before the New York mayoral election, Michael Lange issued a significant electoral prediction – not just who would win overall, but precinct by precinct. Lange, a political analyst born and raised in New York City, devoted over a decade in left-leaning activism and emerged as something of a well-known figure this year for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He released his extremely precise prediction map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate was victorious while missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. Lange possesses a talent for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the split between the progressive stronghold, stretching from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he predicted (correctly) that Mamdani would triumph by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in audience and the majority of electors leaned toward Cuomo, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Patterns and Unexpected Results

What was your election night?

It was necessary since they were adding approximately 200K ballots into the tally frequently! I was actually a little nervous initially: Mamdani was ahead the initial ballots by 12 points, but there were two big batches of votes added later and his lead went from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, there was a world where yesterday turned out somewhat badly for Mamdani, where the opponent would have essentially doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But the winner added 500,000 votes to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He went out and massively expanded his support from the first round.

Expanding Support

How did the mayor-elect gain additional support from?

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and individuals squeezed by affordability. He gained significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Additionally he boosted his core of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: diverse, youthful, renters and people struggling with costs

Additionally, there were some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a real thing, confined to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Electors in ethnic enclaves that went for Trump previously backed Zohran this year. But it’s not that he was winning over white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Turnout and Effects

One of the big stories of the election was the record turnout. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Turnout was significantly higher than anticipated. I thought we might go over two million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – which is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent opposition group, energized, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to win.

You predicted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Right now it appears he’s favored to get over half. He has just over 50% but remain probably 200K ballots left to report at that time. Thus I don’t think certain, but I think probable, and I hope he achieves it so then no one can say the Republican was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His vote plummeted.

He lost a single precinct in any area. Not even Tottenville in the borough, similar to an 88% Trump area. That really was unexpected. Cuomo held very white areas, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained all of these conservatives on the island with a high participation. I believe there was significant tactical voting by GOP voters. They were doing it before Trump tweeted his support for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide unless the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your much mentioned left-wing base – was support for the candidate dominant in those areas of the boroughs?

In my view there was a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, for example, the property owners and homeowners supported the independent. Thus there was a little resistance. However overall, mostly the leftist base is another huge reason why Zohran won – he was polling between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the election we reported on if Mamdani was making inroads with the community. Any indication that he succeeded?

Exist neighborhoods with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as specific locales – where he did well. But in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance definitely mattered there. Similarly in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they all leaned the independent. And also, you have newcomers from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were strongly supportive. Therefore it’s unclear if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city means politically? Will the progressive base become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that key figures from the left come from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that we’ll see additional examples – people will emerge from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that each urban center in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the centers of progressive influence in the nation – since they’re young, tenancy is common and they are places where people are crushed by the inequalities we face.